Social Structures of Ancient Egypt
The pyramid has been used as a visual metaphor to describe the
social structures of ancient Egypt. The position of an individual
in the social pyramid was determined by birth circumstances such
as class, gender and race, and the relationship among social groups
were determined by their occupations.
Ancient Egypt was ruled by a very small rich upper class who enjoyed
power and wealth while the large masses of Egyptian workers and
peasants struggled to subsist. The ruling class depended on a social
system of administrators who organized the work force, managed resources
and taxed the surplus production. For their services, these government
officials received favors and could rise to the highest ranks in
the administration.
Not unlike other ancient or modern societies, the
only possible ways for people of so called low birth to move upwards
in the social structures of ancient Egypt were skill, literacy and
a military career. Peasants could have their sons learn a trade
apprenticed by priests or by artisans. Boys who learned reading,
writing and arithmetics could become scribes and work in the government.
Besides this basic knowledge they could learn a profession, such
as architecture, medicine and engineering and greatly improve their
social status.
Both the military and the priesthood are sometimes
considered separate classes in the social structures of ancient
Egypt, but their members came from all strata of society.
Family
Structure in Ancient Egypt
Ancient
Egypt Utensils
No doubt the upper despised the lower classes as inferiors, and
many instances of abuse were committed, but peasants and farmers
were not slaves. They had property rights and servants could inherit
their masters possessions when these died childless. Other members
of the working class, i.e. artisans, were their own masters. They
owned property and land, and could freely buy and sell their products
in the market.
Since many archaeological excavations are focused on the royal
life, a misconception about the existence of large population settlements
(cities and towns) in Ancient Egypt have pervaded.
Written records exists about the daily activities of the working
class, and household and working utensils have been found, catalogued
and studied. Sir William Flinders Petrie, the father of Egyptian
archaeology, is credited for his enormous contributions to the discovery
of these common objects, which sheds light on life and the social
structures of ancient Egypt.
A recent discovery of an administrative building and granaries
in the present town of Edfu provides physical evidence of a work
place and the importance of commerce as an intricate part of daily
Egyptian life. The Tell Edfu site includes a public town center
that was used for collecting taxes, conducting business, recording
accounting, and writing documents. Grain was used as a form of currency
in Ancient Egypt and, judging by the size of the silos, the town
must have been quite prosperous.
Towns in Ancient Egypt were made of mud brick, much less permanent
than stone. Modern Egyptians live exactly on the same place of their
ancestors, on towns located on the banks of the Nile. This makes
it more difficult for archaeologists to excavate ancient Egyptian
towns, like the one in Edfu. Many are no longer existent, since
soil from the Nile was used in later constructions and farming activities.
Tel Edfu demonstrates the existence of ancient Egyptian urban culture
and the importance of local nobles to the pharaoh's exercise of
power.
|
|